Was the apostle Paul really a scholar as people claim him to be and does his teaching really line up with God?
Matthew 7:16 you shall know them by their fruits, does this scripture gives you a clue. For those who believed that the apostle Paul was a scholar, let’s define scholars first before claiming what Paul was. A Scholar is somebody who has a great deal of knowledge, especially an academic who specializes in a particular arts subject.
No offense, but Paul was no scholar. The man went around causing havoc among God’s people and if he really had as much knowledge as people claim him to have, then he would have known who Jesus was through scripture since the old testament does tell you about the coming of Christ and he wouldn’t have been going around doing the things he did. By the way, Paul teaching comes from the old testament books. So instead of saying he was a scholar tell people the truth, Paul was clueless.
It wasn’t until Paul was baptize that Paul received the Holy Spirit and it was the Holy Spirit that was teaching Paul. So the things Paul knew came from The Holy Spirit, not from Paul being a scholar as the church would like you to believe. If anyone should be called a scholar, it would have to be the disciples since they walked with Christ and was taught by Christ.
And to be able to sit down and write books from their experience, now that is what a true scholars, is. But to say that Paul was a scholar is like putting a little leaguer in with the big league.
We had a nine year old boy who came to the mission to preach one day and the boy had a lot of knowledge. reminded me of the apostle Paul cause he just went from scripture to scripture preaching away but at the end of the service, when the guys went to ask the boy some questions, dealing with the things he taught the boy was clueless.
If Paul was here today, I would have questioned his teaching since a lot of his letters are nothing but a big jigsaw puzzle scrambled around from different scriptures out of the old testament. There are letters that Paul writes that if you sat down (in which I did) and went and found where he says it is either written or scripture, it would have been found in all different part of the old testament. And for those who believe Paul to be all mighty with his teaching, he isn’t. cause there are things that Paul says it is written, which isnt even in the bible. Paul was nothing but a man who sat down with a pen and a pad and picked scripture from the old testament to add to his letters including scriptures of his own belief which is not written as he claim.
Paul may have been choosen by Christ, but Paul was also a liar according to his own letters. since not everything Paul claim to be written is found. anyone can sit down with a piece of paper and pen and write the things Paul wrote. the bible tells us to test the spirit and if you read for yourself the things of Paul, you will know that most of the things Paul wrote are taken out of context, words have been subtracted and added from the scripture he has used.
I believe Paul’s letters are what Paul believed but I would never teach most of the things Paul believes since most of the letters are contradicting and rather it was meant to a certain group of people, why in the world would we teach it to everyone if it was not meant for everyone. If we were to remove Paul’s letters from the bible, I believe it would help us to grow and learn the ways of Jesus and not the ways of Paul.
Paul says he doesn’t allow women to preach, that is not any man call since that is not the way nor the truth. and for a man to tell a woman she can’t preach, is not of God and if its not of God then it shouldn’t be taught. God may have used Paul, but he also used Satan.
Paul claims all sorts of things which were untrue or almost certainly untrue.
First off, he was not a scholar, and DEFINITELY never studied under Gamaliel. That’s a bit like someone saying they’re a student of Stephen Hawking but doesn’t know what an atom is.
He was not a Pharisee. No Pharisee would ever be working under the (Sadducee) High Priest as a hired killer to persecute Pharisee messianic groups.
He was probably not a Jew from birth either, but by conversion.
Finally, he definitely was not a Roman citizen by birth. Considering that he was travelling with a large sum of money at the time, he probably bought his citizenship on the way.
Certainly the boy had a gift but he needed to learn the Scriptures too and he will with time I think.
Paul claims he was a scolar before he meant Jesus on the road to damascus. He also went to Arabia for 14 years of learning before he started preaching—this is hardly mentioned so most people miss this. He did know some things—enough to be interesting and keep talking and preach well.
I would direct you to two books,James the brother of Jesus written by Robert Eisenman. Which shows the corruption by which paul wrote. and the second book The Mythmaker by Hyam Maccoby,which shows the fight between James the most Holy of all men and that scoundrel Paul. Only if you have the time or courage. Thanks for listening Lee span
He studied under Gamaliel in Jerusalem. And was on his way to becoming a leader among his people the Jews. His rabbinic scholarship is unquestioned.
His conversion on the Damascus Road is also unquestioned.
His zealous proclamation of the grace of God in Christ is also unquestioned.
His sufferings and martyrdom for the sake of Christ and His Gospel are also unquestioned.
What you have done is to misunderstand his rabbinic methods of argument and teaching which he still used in his Christian work.
A proper study of the Gospels and the Pauline sermons and letters will show that there is no discrepancy between them.